I didn't say anything when they (the feminists silly) decided that we should call a manhole a personhole, Firemen Firefighters, or Actresses just plain Actors. I understand even why we would like to do this, we want future generations to be more gender neutral…oh no wait, we want them to think in a more gender-neutral manner. However, the Bible is history, should we change how history was to appease the people of today? Perhaps we should add some more gender-neutral roles into the stories of wars gone by. I would hate to think that men were the only ones actually fighting.

Actually, I guess it's not really a comment on how sometimes it seems that feminists can take things a little too serious or offensive. When you look at it what does this say about the bible? The bible is referred to as the one book, it was written in by holy people or the hand of God. Now you want to have the feminist version? You think that sounds better? Why would anyone want to read this bible? It's not the real one.I can see the draw to that belief standard.
"And now people I will read from the books of Matthew, Marc, Lucy, and Joan."

You're basically just saying that the bible is just any book…oh no wait. If it was just any book you couldn't change it because the author owns the writes to what is inside of it.

I understand that the bible has a lot of male dominant references, but that is how society was when it was written. You can change society but should you be allowed to change history? Should we say that Hitler was a woman? Well he was evil enough…Oh I'm gonna pay for that one. Actually when it is all said and done with I don't really care if you want to change the bible to read person wherever it says man. Actually I don't even really care if feminists still feel that they have to change every part of society before they'll be happy. It's the fact that they feel that they have the right to do it. Bleargh…it's been a slow week.

Send this article to a friend...tell them they need help!